91 Closings, $102.8M in Volume: In Petaluma's Q1 2026, the Top Two Price Bands Ran at More Than Double the Rest Per Square Foot

The period at a glance
| Metric | Q1 2026 |
|---|---|
| Total closings | 91 |
| Total volume | $102,787,960 |
| Median sale price | $975,000 |
| Median price per sq ft | $543 |
| Median square footage | 1,869 |
| Median lot size | 6,000 sq ft |
| Price range | $400,000 – $3,500,000 |
| Months in period | January – March 2026 |
| List prices in source | Not available |
List prices are absent from the county record and MLS export used here. Ninety-one sales closed across Petaluma's six recorded segments in the first quarter of 2026, generating just over $102.8 million in aggregate volume. The overall median landed at $975,000 on 91 closings, though that single figure papers over a quarter with pronounced internal tension: the two sales above $3 million logged a combined median price per square foot of $1,315 — more than twice the $548 recorded in the $1M–$1.5M band directly below them, and nearly three times the $485 in the under-$1M band that accounted for the largest share of transactions.
Days on market were recorded for zero of the 91 closings in this source, so no speed analysis is possible for the quarter. What the record does show is that activity accelerated through the period: March closed 37 transactions against 27 each in January and February, pushing the quarter's price-per-square-foot reading to its highest monthly point at $558. The single-family segment, at 63 of 91 closings, anchored the quarter; the Other segment — which includes rural and agricultural properties — produced the quarter's top sale at $3.5 million while posting the widest price range of any category.
The sales
Table shows the top 40 of 91 closings by sale price. The remaining 51 are not shown but are included in all summary figures.
| Address | Segment | Beds | Sq Ft | $/Sq Ft | Sale Price | Closed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1975 Middle Two Rock Rd | Other | 3 | 2,216 | $1,579 | $3,500,000 | Mar 6 |
| 2183 Live Oak Farm Lane | Single Family | 4 | 2,995 | $1,051 | $3,146,500 | Mar 27 |
| 365 Ely Road N | Single Family | 4 | 4,289 | $670 | $2,875,000 | Jan 26 |
| 146 Shelina Vista Ln | Single Family | 5 | 3,520 | $648 | $2,282,000 | Mar 26 |
| 23 Pinnacle Dr | Single Family | 4 | 3,454 | $618 | $2,136,000 | Feb 19 |
| 105 G Street | Single Family | 3 | 2,047 | $1,008 | $2,063,000 | Mar 9 |
| 2850 Western Avenue | Single Family | 4 | 2,828 | $705 | $1,992,715 | Jan 22 |
| 15 Kingswood Dr | Single Family | 4 | 3,458 | $564 | $1,950,000 | Feb 3 |
| 100 Metz Lane | Single Family | 5 | 3,388 | $562 | $1,905,000 | Jan 9 |
| 811 D Street | Single Family | 4 | 3,672 | $483 | $1,775,000 | Feb 27 |
| 1811 Maiden Ln | Single Family | 5 | 3,416 | $501 | $1,710,000 | Mar 30 |
| 3957 Lakeville Hwy | Other | 4 | 1,878 | $905 | $1,700,000 | Mar 20 |
| 288 Ely Road N | Single Family | 3 | 1,400 | $1,143 | $1,600,000 | Jan 7 |
| 255 Photinia Place | Single Family | 3 | 2,371 | $654 | $1,550,000 | Feb 10 |
| 700 Old King Road | Single Family | 3 | 2,728 | $565 | $1,540,000 | Mar 27 |
| 509 Rainsville Road | Single Family | 4 | 2,665 | $550 | $1,465,000 | Feb 26 |
| 923 B St | Single Family | 6 | 1,904 | $746 | $1,421,000 | Mar 6 |
| 523 6th Street | Single Family | 5 | 2,774 | $507 | $1,406,000 | Feb 3 |
| 1713 Avila Ranch Dr | Single Family | 4 | 2,541 | $545 | $1,385,000 | Jan 15 |
| 805 Lohrman Lane | Single Family | 2 | 893 | $1,529 | $1,365,000 | Mar 2 |
| 427 Fair Street | Single Family | 3 | 1,672 | $816 | $1,365,000 | Mar 17 |
| 874 Cherry St | Single Family | 4 | 2,464 | $532 | $1,310,000 | Mar 19 |
| 1100 Lohrman Lane | Single Family | 3 | 1,704 | $748 | $1,275,000 | Feb 12 |
| 218 Windsor Dr | Other | 4 | 2,388 | $528 | $1,260,000 | Feb 5 |
| 391 King Road | Mobile Home | 3 | 1,188 | $1,051 | $1,249,000 | Jan 6 |
| 1750 Stone Creek Dr | Single Family | 5 | 1,988 | $619 | $1,230,000 | Mar 30 |
| 6 Jasper Ct | Single Family | 5 | 3,302 | $361 | $1,192,000 | Jan 29 |
| 716 Keller Ct | Other | 2 | 1,398 | $840 | $1,175,000 | Mar 13 |
| 1878 Adobe Creek Dr | Other | 5 | 2,650 | $443 | $1,175,000 | Mar 18 |
| 591 Madison St | Single Family | 4 | 2,078 | $558 | $1,160,000 | Mar 26 |
| 610 E St | Single Family | 3 | 1,540 | $747 | $1,150,000 | Jan 9 |
| 1889 Falcon Ridge Dr | Other | 4 | 2,330 | $494 | $1,150,000 | Jan 27 |
| 2 Wedgewood Court | Single Family | 4 | 2,650 | $434 | $1,149,000 | Mar 4 |
| 586 Sapphire St | Single Family | 4 | 2,631 | $429 | $1,129,000 | Mar 3 |
| 9 Arlene Ct | Single Family | 3 | 1,869 | $594 | $1,110,000 | Jan 9 |
| 1021 Mcnear Avenue | Single Family | 3 | 1,507 | $737 | $1,110,000 | Mar 13 |
| 1917 Falcon Ridge Dr | Other | 3 | 1,930 | $570 | $1,100,000 | Feb 27 |
| 710 Old Adobe Road | Multi-family | 3 | 1,556 | $707 | $1,100,000 | Jan 27 |
| 1711 Capistrano Dr | Single Family | 6 | 2,647 | $415 | $1,099,000 | Jan 18 |
| 65 Riverbend Lane | Single Family | 4 | 2,078 | $525 | $1,091,745 | Jan 13 |
Four transactions account for the quarter's defining range. At 1975 Middle Two Rock Road, a 1957-built, 3-bedroom home on 8.2 acres closed at $3,500,000 on March 6 — $1,579 per square foot, the highest rate in the quarter by a substantial margin, and a figure that pulls the Other segment's headline numbers upward considerably. That same week, 105 G Street, a 3-bedroom single-family at 2,047 square feet, closed at $2,063,000 ($1,008/sq ft), making it the priciest non-Other, non-rural result in the quarter on a per-foot basis among homes above 1,500 square feet.
At the opposite end of the size-versus-price dynamic, 6 Jasper Court — a 2022-built, 5-bedroom home at 3,302 square feet — closed at $1,192,000 on January 29, a rate of $361 per square foot: the lowest per-foot figure in the top 40. And 805 Lohrman Lane, at just 893 square feet with two bedrooms, closed March 2 at $1,365,000 ($1,529/sq ft), a reminder that lot position and location attributes not captured in square footage alone explain a portion of what the record shows.
Where the market split
By segment
| Segment | Closings | Median Price | Median $/Sq Ft | Median Sq Ft | Price Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Single Family | 63 | $1,050,000 | $550 | 1,904 | $525,000 – $3,146,500 |
| Other | 14 | $1,050,000 | $537 | 1,817 | $608,000 – $3,500,000 |
| Condominium | 6 | $592,500 | $399 | 1,486 | $400,000 – $705,000 |
| Townhouse | 4 | $692,500 | $411 | 1,771 | $619,000 – $815,000 |
| Multi-family | 3 | $960,000 | $707 | 1,556 | $750,000 – $1,100,000 |
| Mobile Home | 1 | — | — | 1,188 | $1,249,000 |
The single-family segment supplied 63 of 91 closings, with a median of $1,050,000 on 1,904 median square feet at $550 per foot. The Other segment — 14 closings spanning farms, rural parcels, and properties that do not fit standard residential categories — matched that same $1,050,000 median price but carried a wider range, from $608,000 to $3,500,000. That range is entirely a function of what lands in the category: the $3.5M Two Rock Road sale sits alongside more conventionally priced suburban-edge properties.
The condominium segment's six closings produced a $592,500 median — the lowest of any segment with enough sales to support one — at $399 per square foot. Townhouses, with four closings, registered a $692,500 median at $411 per foot. Multi-family recorded three closings ranging from $750,000 to $1,100,000; with exactly three transactions, the $960,000 figure is the middle sale, not a statistically robust median. The single mobile home closing — 391 King Road at $1,249,000 — stands alone; no segment median applies to one transaction.
By price band
| Band | Closings | Median $/Sq Ft |
|---|---|---|
| Under $1M | 46 | $485 |
| $1M – $1.5M | 30 | $548 |
| $1.5M – $2M | 9 | $565 |
| $2M – $3M | 4 | $659 |
| $3M – $5M | 2 | $1,315 |
The price-band table is where the quarter's internal structure becomes legible. More than half of all closings — 46 of 91 — came in below $1 million, at a median of $485 per square foot. The next band, $1M to $1.5M, captured 30 closings at $548/sq ft. Those two bands together account for 83% of all transactions.
Above $1.5 million, volume drops sharply: nine closings in the $1.5M–$2M range, four in $2M–$3M, and two above $3 million. The per-foot rate climbs with each step, but the jump between $2M–$3M ($659/sq ft, four closings) and $3M–$5M ($1,315/sq ft, two closings) is not a smooth progression — it reflects the specific character of the two transactions that cleared that threshold, both of which carried rural or estate-scale land components.
Across the period
| Month | Closings | Median Price | Median $/Sq Ft |
|---|---|---|---|
| January 2026 | 27 | $1,050,000 | $545 |
| February 2026 | 27 | $955,000 | $528 |
| March 2026 | 37 | $1,005,000 | $558 |
January and February each recorded 27 closings, then March added 37 — a 37% increase in transaction count. The January median of $1,050,000 dropped in February to $955,000, the quarter's low point on both price and per-foot rate ($528). March recovered to $1,005,000 at $558 per square foot, the quarter's high on that measure, on the strength of its larger transaction count and the inclusion of two closings above $3 million.
The February dip is worth noting alongside the volume surge in March. Whether deals that would otherwise have closed in February were recorded in March, or whether the composition of March closings simply skewed toward higher-priced properties, the county record does not tell us. What it does show is that the quarter's per-foot rate tracked: down from January to February, up from February to March, finishing the quarter above where it started.
What it means
For sellers: Sixty-three single-family closings in ninety days, at a median of $1,050,000, describes an active quarter for that segment. The under-$1M band accounted for 46 of 91 total closings — the largest single band — and produced transactions across the full spectrum of the city's neighborhoods, which indicates the lower end of the market remained liquid throughout the quarter. Properties above $2 million closed in small numbers (six total), and their per-foot rates diverged significantly from the broader market, suggesting pricing in that range operated on different dynamics than the volume-driven bands below.
For buyers: The $1M–$1.5M band — 30 closings at a $548 median per square foot — was the quarter's busiest segment of the market above seven figures, producing more transactions than the three bands above it combined. The condominium and townhouse segments, at six and four closings respectively, represent the quarter's smallest transaction pools in attached housing; the condominium range ran $400,000 to $705,000, providing Petaluma's lowest entry point among recorded segment types with more than one closing.
For owners not transacting: The overall quarterly median of $975,000 on 91 closings reflects a market where median square footage was 1,869 and the median lot was 6,000 square feet. The quarter produced $102.8 million in total recorded volume. Month-to-month, the median price moved within a $95,000 range — from $955,000 in February to $1,050,000 in January and approaching that again in March — without the kind of single-month outlier that would distort the quarter's overall picture.
Jake Taylor · CA DRE #02070119
[email protected] · (707) 630-1001
More from Petaluma

What Your Petaluma Home Is Missing Depends on When It Was Built
More than half of Petaluma's parcels were built before 1980, when insulation requirements were thin and single-pane glass was standard. Knowing your era tells you where to start.

Clean Your Gutters Before Petaluma's First Rain Does the Job for You
More than half of Petaluma's housing stock was built before 1980. That means a lot of gutters that have been bending, settling, and collecting debris for decades. September is the window to sort them out.

Two homes hit the Petaluma MLS on September 25 — and that was the day
A single-family home on Burlington Drive and a townhouse on Drake Court appeared on the MLS feed on September 25. No sales recorded, no contracts signed.